Pages

Saturday, October 5, 2013

New owners causing friction


 Image © supportersnotcustomers.com

The influx of foreign ownership in soccer has been something that I’ve always been a bit cautious about. While I’d like to see a smaller club shake things up a bit, a lot of them just turn into billionaires’ playthings instead of serious ventures into soccer. With money being an issue in sport these sorts of owners are welcomed readily but more often than not they leave the club in a worse state than when they took over.

There’s two clubs that have come up to the Premier League this season that serve as prime examples of owners not taking fans into account when running their new teams. 

Malaysian investor, Vincent Tan, who took over at Cardiff two years ago decided on what seemed like a whim, that they would change the club’s colours from blue to red. Tan’s reasoning behind it was that the colour red appeals more to the Asian audience that he wanted to tap into. It is a valid way to expand into a new market. But why do that at the expense of the already loyal local fanbase?

They eventually went through with the rebrand. The club itself has never and probably won’t be big enough for a while for them to justify the change. The new fans that they did get through the rebrand may not stick around for long. So all it really did was alienate a large section of supporters.

There’s also Hull City owner, Assem Allam, who has also been talking about changing the club’s name to The Hull Tigers, claiming it’d be easier to market to a global audience. Again, as with Cardiff, it seems to be at the expense of existing fans.

Hull are one of the few clubs to have kept their name intact since their inception in 1904 and there’s a lot of tradition behind it. As with the Everton logo debacle I talked about in the last post, this is something fans take very seriously and it could have serious repercussions for Hull. Through personal experience there’s nothing that soccer fans seem to hate more than the Americanisation of the sport so adding the Tigers nickname to the end of the team name is going to really alienate a large portion of their local fans.

This kind of behaviour is what has concerned me the most about new owners coming into the game. At some level I understand that they want to shake things up but sport is one place where changes, especially drastic ones that concern the team’s identity, are not very welcome.